Breaking News

Appeals Court Questions Yet Again if it Has Jurisdiction Over Lilly’s 340B Contract Pharmacy Case

Screenshot of 7th Circuit Court Chief Judge Frank Easterbrook on C-SPAN2
Federal appeals court Judge Frank Easterbrook is pictured during an appearance on C-SPAN in 2013. Easterbrook during a court hearing today questioned whether a closely watched 340B contract pharmacy case was ripe for appellate review.

A federal appeals court judge in Chicago expressed doubt during a hearing this morning that the court can review a lower court decision in drug manufacturer Eli Lilly’s 340B contract pharmacy lawsuit.

Judge Frank Easterbrook, the senior judge on the

Read More »

Second of Three U.S. Appeals Court Hearings on 340B Contract Pharmacy Is Set for Monday

US Appeals Court Seventh Circuit court room
Oral arguments are scheduled for this Monday at the federal appeals court in Chicago over Lilly's 340B contract pharmacy restrictions.

Now that a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., has heard arguments in Novartis and United Therapeutics’ 340B contract pharmacy lawsuits, the scene shifts to Chicago, where an appeals court will hear arguments Monday morning in Eli Lilly’s companion case.

Read More »

News Alert

Federal Appellate Judges Ask Lawyers, What is a Bona Fide Offer of 340B Pricing?

Screenshot of Judge Gregory Katsas speaking on C-SPAN
Judge Gregory Katsas is on a three-judge panel that will decide the legality of HRSA's 340B program violation letters to Novartis and United Therapeutics. He is shown here speaking at an October 2021 symposium on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, for whom he clerked. | C-SPAN

Two of three judges on a federal appeals court panel yesterday repeatedly asked lawyers during a highly anticipated hearing in Washington, D.C., what standard the court should use to decide whether drug manufacturers’ 340B contract pharmacy conditions are legal.

The

Read More »

New York State Stands by its 340B-Related Antitrust Claims Against CVS

CVS retail building
New York State last week reasserted claims that CVS Health illegally forces 340B providers to use its 340B TPA Wellpartner.

The New York State attorney general last week reasserted that CVS Health abused its market power by forcing 340B covered entities who use CVS to dispense 340B-priced drugs to use the retail chain’s third-party administrator Wellpartner to process their 340B

Read More »

Feds in Mediation with Tenn. Health System that Allegedly Paid for Referrals to Boost 340B Profits

Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare building
Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare and the federal government have settled a 340B-related False Claims Act suit against the system.

The federal government and a Tennessee health system are meeting with a mediator in connection with a whistleblower lawsuit that alleges that the system paid Memphis-area cancer physicians for referrals that generated $50 million in profits in one year alone

Read More »

Breaking News

In Key Hearing, Appeals Court Panel Seems to Lean in Favor of Some Drug Manufacturer Conditions on 340B Pricing

CADC courtroom
A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., heard arguments this morning in Novartis and United Therapeutics' consolidated 340B contract pharmacy cases.

Two of three judges on a federal appeals court panel strongly indicated this morning that they reject the federal government’s position that nothing in the 340B statute gives drug manufacturers the right to put any conditions on offers of 340B

Read More »

PhRMA Makes its Case for Invalidating Arkansas’s First-of-its-Kind 340B Contract Pharmacy Law

PhRMA wordmark repeated on blue background
"There is no room for states, pharmacies, or other interests to step in and try to supplant” the federal government’s exclusive control over the 340B program, PhRMA told a federal district court in Arkansas late last week.

The 340B program “has always been uniquely federal in nature” and “there is no room for states, pharmacies, or other interests to step in and try to supplant” the federal government’s exclusive control over it, the brand drug industry said

Read More »

Federal Court Clears Way for Medicare to Boost 340B Hospitals’ Part B Drug Payments

U.S. District Court Washington D.C. building
A federal district court in Washington, D.C., cleared the way for CMS to resume paying hospitals at ASP +6% for 340B drugs in as quickly as two weeks.

A federal district judge on Monday cleared the way for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in as quickly as two weeks to resume paying hospitals at the rate of average sales price (ASP) plus 6% for their

Read More »

UCB Files 340B Contract Pharmacy Suit Against HHS, the Ninth Company to Do So

UCB signage and building
UCB announced it will tighten its existing 340B contract restrictions on hospitals beginning Oct. 2.

Drug manufacturer UCB has sued in federal court to overturn federal health officials’ finding that the Belgian company’s restrictions on 340B pricing when covered entities use contract pharmacies are illegal and must stop or the company could face civil monetary

Read More »

U.S. Appeals Court Tentatively Set to Hear Three 340B Contract Pharmacy Cases on Nov. 15

U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals court house entrance
A federal appeals court in Philadelphia is currently set to hear arguments in a trio of key 340B contract pharmacy cases on Nov. 15.

As we first reported Friday in a news alert, a federal appeals court in Philadelphia has tentatively scheduled oral arguments in three key 340B contract pharmacy lawsuits for Nov. 15.

The clerk of the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Read More »
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
×

*Sign up for news summaries and alerts from 340B Report