Five Major Drug Makers Oppose Health Center’s Legal Challenge to 340B Patient Definition

340B patient definition case
AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, and Merck jointly asked a federal district court to dismiss a health center’s challenge to the 340B patient definition. Drug maker Janssen asked the same separately.
Drug makers AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Lilly, and Merck asked a federal district court in South Carolina on Friday [...]

Please Login or Become a Paid Subscriber to View this Content

If you are already a
Read More »

340B Patient Definition Is at the Heart of Case Debated Before Federal Appeals Court

USCA Fourth Circuit court building
A federal appeals court in Richmond, Va., heard arguments last month in a case involving the legality of the 340B program definition of "patient."

Part 2 of a Two-Part Series About One of the Most Important and Contentious Areas of the 340B Program. Read Part 1 here.

An attorney for a South Carolina health center asked a federal appeals court in Richmond, Va., last

Read More »

While All Eyes are on 340B Contract Pharmacy Battle, Federal Appeals Court Hears Arguments in Key Case Challenging HRSA’s Patient Definition

Genesis Health Care office sign and facility
A South Carolina health center's lawsuit, now before a federal appeals court, challenges one of of the 340B program's basic elements—the definition of a “patient” eligible to receive 340B drugs.

Part 1 of Two-Part Deep Dive into One of the Most Important and Contentious Areas of 340B Program

While much of the 340B community’s attention has been focused on the contract pharmacy suits winding through the federal court system, there

Read More »
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

*Sign up for news summaries and alerts from 340B Report