While All Eyes are on 340B Contract Pharmacy Battle, Federal Appeals Court Hears Arguments in Key Case Challenging HRSA’s Patient Definition

A federal appeals court heard arguments last month in a South Carolina health center’s lawsuit challenging one of the 340B program’s bedrock principles—the definition of a “patient” eligible to receive 340B drugs.

Please Login or Become a Paid Subscriber to View this Content

If you are already a paid subscriber, please follow the steps below.

Please be sure you’ve completed your one-minute subscription completion form.
I have read and accepted the terms of use and privacy policy.
Log In!

While All Eyes are on 340B Contract Pharmacy Battle, Federal Appeals Court Hears Arguments in Key Case Challenging HRSA’s Patient Definition

Please Login or Become a Paid Subscriber to View this Content

If you are already a paid subscriber, please follow the steps below.

If you are not yet a paid subscriber, please Subscribe now.

For questions about subscriptions or technical assistance, please contact Reshma Eggleston at reshma.eggleston@340breport.com.

Tom Mirga