A federal appeals court in Richmond, Va., heard arguments last month in a case involving the legality of the 340B program definition of "patient."
340B Patient Definition Is at the Heart of Case Debated Before Federal Appeals Court
An attorney for a South Carolina health center asked a federal appeals court in Richmond, Va., last month to reverse a lower court decision that left the longstanding 340B program definition of “patient” in effect—a definition that the health center says is at odds with the 340B statute’s actual requirements.
Please Login or Become a Paid Subscriber to View this Content
If you are already a paid subscriber, please follow the steps below.