Arkansas Ending PhRMA Proceeding Against State 340B Contract Pharmacy Law as Focus Turns to Federal Lawsuit

Arkansas's insurance commissioner is ending PhRMA's state administrative proceeding to stop his department from implementing and enforcing the state’s 340B contract pharmacy law.

The Arkansas Insurance Department (AID) is ending the drug industry’s state administrative proceeding to stop the department from implementing and enforcing the state’s novel 340B contract pharmacy law.

In his Oct. 5 order ending the proceeding, Insurance Commissioner Alan

Read More »

340B ADR Rule Is Fundamentally Defective, PhRMA Tells Federal Court

PhRMA told a federal court in Baltimore, Md., that none of the federal government's legal arguments "can hide the fundamental defects" in the 340B ADR rule.

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America told a federal district judge last week that the federal government has failed to refute PhRMA’s contention that the regulation establishing the 340B administrative dispute resolution (ADR) process “is unconstitutional, procedurally defective, and relies

Read More »

News Alert: Judge Denies Sanofi Stay Against 340B ADR Proceedings, as Stakeholders Brace for Coming Whirlwind of Crucial Decisions in 340B Cases

A federal district judge yesterday denied Sanofi's emergency request for a stay against 340B ADR proceedings, in part because she said she will rule in Sanofi's 340B contract pharmacy lawsuit on or before Nov. 5.

A federal district judge in New Jersey has denied drug manufacturer Sanofi’s emergency motion for a stay against 340B administrative dispute resolution (ADR) proceedings—in part because she said she will hand down her decision in Sanofi’s 340B contract pharmacy lawsuit

Read More »

A Closer Look at Critical Court Hearing on 340B Contract Pharmacy Legality

A federal district court in Washington, D.C., heard arguments this week in Novartis and United Therapeutics' 340B contract pharmacy lawsuits.

U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich all but told the federal government during a court hearing in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday she rejects its basic argument that the plain text of the 340B statute requires drug manufacturers to honor 340B purchases

Read More »

Feds Oppose Sanofi’s Request for Emergency Protection Against 340B ADR Proceedings

The federal government yesterday opposed Sanofi's request to a judge to grant it emergency protection from 340B dispute resolution proceedings.

The federal government yesterday asked a federal district judge to deny drug manufacturer Sanofi’s request for emergency protection from being brought before a 340B administrative dispute resolution panel.

Sanofi asked the judge for an emergency stay last week. The

Read More »

Judge Expresses Doubt About Government’s Position During Arguments in Novartis and United Therapeutics’ 340B Contract Pharmacy Lawsuits

U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich said today she agreed with another federal judge that the plain text of the 340B statute "doesn't speak" to contract pharmacy.

A federal district judge said today she “has a hard time following” the federal government’s argument that the 340B statute requires drug manufacturers to honor covered entities’ drug purchases no matter how entities choose to distribute the medicines.

“It seems

Read More »

Feds Have Until Tomorrow to Oppose Sanofi’s Request for Stay Against 340B ADR Proceedings

U.S. Chief District Judge Freda Wolfson gave government lawyers until the end of the day tomorrow to weigh in on Sanofi’s request for emergency protection from 340B ADR proceedings.

A federal district judge has given government lawyers until Wednesday to weigh in on drug manufacturer Sanofi’s request for emergency protection from being brought before a 340B administrative dispute resolution panel.

U.S. Chief District Judge Freda Wolfson gave the U.S.

Read More »

Sanofi Seeks Emergency Stay Blocking 340B Dispute Resolution Proceedings

Drug manufacturer Sanofi yesterday asked a federal judge in New Jersey for an emergency stay against 340B administrative dispute resolution (ADR) proceedings against it brought by health centers.

Drug manufacturer Sanofi yesterday asked a federal judge in New Jersey to stay 340B administrative dispute resolution (ADR) proceedings against it brought by health centers seeking to overturn Sanofi’s restrictions on 340B pricing when covered entities use contract pharmacies.

Sanofi

Read More »

Judge Sets Deadlines for Briefs in 340B Contract Pharmacy Antitrust Suit

U.S. Chief District Judge Elizabeth Wolford has set deadlines for briefs in a New York health center's 340B contract pharmacy antitrust lawsuit against four drug companies.

A federal district judge in Rochester, N.Y., has given four insulin and diabetes drug manufacturers until Oct. 29 to file a motion to dismiss an upstate New York health center’s lawsuit claiming the manufacturers conspired to stop offering 340B pricing

Read More »

New Judge Assigned to PhRMA’s Lawsuit Challenging Arkansas’s First-of-Its-Kind 340B Nondiscrimination Law

U.S. Senior District Judge Billy Roy Wilson has been assigned to PhRMA's lawsuit challenging Arkansas’s 340B nondiscrimination act.

A new federal district judge has been assigned to Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America’s (PhRMA) lawsuit challenging Arkansas’s 340B nondiscrimination act.

PhRMA’s case, filed on Sept. 29, was initially assigned to U.S. District Judge Lee Rudofsky, a Trump appointee.

Read More »
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
×

*Sign up for news summaries and alerts from 340B Report

Site Footer Live