340B hospital challenge to Medicare Part B reimbursement could reverse long-standing legal doctrine.

Supreme Court Preserves ACA and, with it, the Health Care Reform Law’s 340B Provisions

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7-2 this morning that Texas and a dozen other Republican-led states lacked standing to challenge the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act.

In addition to expanding health insurance to 21 million Americans, the ACA included multiple major provisions affecting the 340B program. If the decision had gone the other way, and the court had struck down the entire ACA as unconstitutional, those 340B provisions would have been struck down with it. They include:

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7-2 this morning that Texas and a dozen other Republican-led states lacked standing to challenge the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act.

Please Login or Become a Paid Subscriber to View this Content

If you are already a paid subscriber, please follow the steps below.
If you are not yet a paid subscriber, take advantage of our lowest-ever discount opportunity which we have extended through June 21: 25% off our regular subscription rates. Subscribe now using coupon code INVESTIGATE25 at checkout.
For questions about subscriptions or technical assistance, please contact Reshma Eggleston at reshma.eggleston@340breport.com.
« Read Previous Read Next »
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Attend Our Upcoming Webinar

×


Learn More

Sign up for our free news summaries and alerts