A federal district judge in Indianapolis late this afternoon set aside and vacated the federal government’s May 17 finding that drug manufacturer Eli Lilly’s denials of 340B ceiling prices when covered entities use contract pharmacies violate the 340B statute.
A spokesperson for Lilly said this evening “Lilly is encouraged by today’s opinion, which confirms that the government’s enforcement decision against it was improper.”
A federal district judge in Indianapolis late this afternoon set aside and vacated the federal government’s May 17 finding that drug manufacturer Eli Lilly’s denials of 340B ceiling prices when covered entities use contract pharmacies violates the 340B statute.
Please Login or Become a Paid Subscriber to View this Content
If you are already a paid subscriber, please follow the steps below.