The 340B statute “is silent as to the role that contract pharmacies may play in connection with covered entities’ purchases of 340B drugs," a judge ruled Wednesday in a suit filed by AstraZeneca.

340B Entity Groups Accentuate Positives in 340B Contract Pharmacy Court Opinion

Groups representing 340B covered entities are emphasizing the positives in what they say was a federal judge’s otherwise disappointing opinion Wednesday on whether drug makers must offer 340B ceiling prices when covered entities use contract pharmacies.

Please Login or Become a Paid Subscriber to View this Content

If you are already a paid subscriber, please follow the steps below.
If you are not yet a paid subscriber, take advantage of our lowest-ever discount opportunity which we have extended through June 21: 25% off our regular subscription rates. Subscribe now using coupon code INVESTIGATE25 at checkout.
For questions about subscriptions or technical assistance, please contact Reshma Eggleston at reshma.eggleston@340breport.com.
« Read Previous Read Next »
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content