In Taking Up 340B Case, Supreme Court Could Reverse Longstanding Legal Doctrine

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to take up a case involving steep Medicare Part B payment cuts to 340B hospital-operated outpatient sites took many legal experts by surprise. However, attorneys that 340B Report conferred with believe the court will be using the case to reexamine a nearly 40-year-old legal doctrine regarding how federal agencies draft and adopt regulations.

Please Login or Become a Paid Subscriber to View this Content

If you are already a paid subscriber, please follow the steps below.

Please be sure you’ve completed your one-minute subscription completion form.
I have read and accepted the terms of use and privacy policy.
Log In!

In Taking Up 340B Case, Supreme Court Could Reverse Longstanding Legal Doctrine

Please Login or Become a Paid Subscriber to View this Content

If you are already a paid subscriber, please follow the steps below.

If you are not yet a paid subscriber, please Subscribe now.

For questions about subscriptions or technical assistance, please contact Reshma Eggleston at reshma.eggleston@340breport.com.

Ron Shinkman