Our six-part investigative series takes an in-depth look into a question often asked by 340B providers: Why can’t they access 340B pricing on one of Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene’s most profitable drug products? We also delve into serious fraud allegations, Congressional oversight, and the possibility of a renewed focus on this contentious area under new leadership at the U.S. Health and Human Services Department. Throughout the series, we also provide BMS/Celgene's viewpoint, their justification for their drug pricing practices, limited distribution policies and why they believe they are following the law.

Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene Myeloma Drugs: Patient-Safety or Profit Motive? Part 5

In Federal, Judicial, Legislative, Pharma Industry, Regulatory, Research/ReportsJune 11, 2021392 Views

Tom Mirga

Last September, the Democratic-controlled U.S. House Oversight and Reform Committee released a 45-page report focused on Celgene and Bristol Myers Squibb’s (BMS’s) nearly two dozen price increases on Revlimid from 2005, when Celgene bought the drug, through 2019. It was part of a two-year committee investigation of several leading drug manufacturers’ price increases, executive compensation, and alleged strategies to limit competition and maximize profits.

Please Login or Become a Paid Subscriber to View this Content

If you are already a paid subscriber, please follow the steps below.

Please be sure you’ve completed your one-minute subscription completion form.
I have read and accepted the terms of use and privacy policy.
Log In!

If you are not yet a paid subscriber, please Subscribe now.

For questions about subscriptions or technical assistance, please contact Reshma Eggleston at reshma.eggleston@340breport.com.

Tom Mirga

Exact matches only

Search in title

Search in content

Search in excerpt

Hidden

*Sign up for news summaries and alerts from 340B Report