A federal district judge has stayed Boehringer Ingelheim’s 340B contract pharmacy lawsuit.

Judge Grants Stay in Boehringer Ingelheim’s 340B Contract Pharmacy Lawsuit

A federal district judge in Washington, D.C., has paused Boehringer Ingelheim’s (BI) 340B contract pharmacy lawsuit while the federal government decides whether to appeal the same judge’s Nov. 5 joint ruling in Novartis and United Therapeutics’ (UT) contract pharmacy suits.

U.S. District Judge Dabney Fredrich on Dec. 9 granted the government and BI’s joint motion for a stay. BI is challenging the government’s Oct. 4 determination that the company’s restrictions on 340B pricing when hospitals use contract pharmacies are illegal. Novartis and UT likewise sued the government after both got similar 340B program violation notices about their contract pharmacy policies.

A federal district judge in Washington, D.C., has paused Boehringer Ingelheim’s (BI) 340B contract pharmacy lawsuit while the federal government decides whether to appeal the same judge’s Nov. 5 joint ruling in Novartis and United Therapeutics’ (UT) contract pharmacy suits.

Please Login or Become a Paid Subscriber to View this Content

If you are already a paid subscriber, please follow the steps below.
If you are not yet a paid subscriber, please Subscribe now.
For questions about subscriptions or technical assistance, please contact Reshma Eggleston at reshma.eggleston@340breport.com.
« Read Previous Read Next »
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
×

*Sign up for news summaries and alerts from 340B Report

Site Footer