The federal government has asked three more federal judges to not let hospital groups intervene in drug manufacturers' lawsuits challenging HHS's 340B contract pharmacy requirements. | Shutterstock

Feds Oppose Hospitals’ Intervention in Three More Pharma 340B Lawsuits

The federal government has asked federal district judges in Indianapolis, Delaware, and New Jersey to deny hospital groups’ requests for active roles in drug manufacturers Eli Lilly’s, AstraZeneca’s, and Sanofi’s lawsuits against the government over its 340B contract pharmacy requirements.

Last week, the government asked Chief Judge Freda L. Wolfson of the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey to not let the groups—American Hospital Association (AHA), 340B Health, America’s Essential Hospitals, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), Children’s Hospital Association (CHA), and ASHP (American Society of Health-System Pharmacists)—intervene in manufacturer Novo Nordisk’s 340B contract pharmacy suit against the U.S. Health and Human Services Department (HHS).

The federal government has asked federal district judges in Indianapolis, Delaware, and New Jersey to deny hospital groups’ requests for active roles in drug manufacturers’ Eli Lilly’s, AstraZeneca’s, and Sanofi’s lawsuits against the government over its 340B contract pharmacy requirements.

Please Login or Become a Paid Subscriber to View this Content

If you are already a paid subscriber, please follow the steps below.
If you are not yet a paid subscriber, please Subscribe now.
For questions about subscriptions or technical assistance, please contact Reshma Eggleston at reshma.eggleston@340breport.com.
« Read Previous Read Next »
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
×

*Sign up for news summaries and alerts from 340B Report

Site Footer