The U.S. Supreme Court opinion striking down huge cuts in 340B hospitals’ Medicare Part B drug reimbursement “is a clear and much welcome victory" for the hospitals, 340B Report Publisher and CEO Ted Slafsky says.

340B Report Publisher and CEO: Takeaways from Supreme Court’s Part B Cuts Decision

The U.S. Supreme Court’s unanimous June 15 ruling that huge cuts in 340B hospitals’ Medicare Part B drug reimbursement were unlawful “is a clear and much welcome victory for 340B hospitals,” 340B Report Publisher and CEO Ted Slafsky says in his latest column for medication management solutions company Omnicell.

Slafsky reached out to a half dozen attorneys who specialize in the 340B program for their thoughts about the court’s decision. He said those conversations yielded five key takeaways:

The U.S. Supreme Court’s unanimous June 15 ruling that huge cuts in 340B hospitals’ Medicare Part B drug reimbursement were unlawful “is a clear and much welcome victory for 340B hospitals,” 340B Report Publisher and CEO Ted Slafsky says in his latest column for medication management solutions company Omnicell.

Please Login or Become a Paid Subscriber to View this Content

If you are already a paid subscriber, please follow the steps below.
If you are not yet a paid subscriber, please Subscribe now.
For questions about subscriptions or technical assistance, please contact Reshma Eggleston at reshma.eggleston@340breport.com.
« Read Previous Read Next »
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
×

*Sign up for news summaries and alerts from 340B Report

Site Footer