The government’s position that United Therapeutics’ (UT) restrictions on 340B contract pharmacies are illegal “contravenes the plain text” of the 340B statute, the drug company told a federal district judge on Friday.
The U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration’s (HRSA) conclusion “is also invalid because it rests on no valid legal or factual foundation,” and is arbitrary and capricious on multiple grounds, UT said in a July 17 motion for summary judgement. The government’s response is due by Aug. 10.
The government’s position that United Therapeutics’ (UT) restrictions on 340B contract pharmacies are illegal “contravenes the plain text” of the 340B statute, the drug company told a federal district judge on Friday.
Please Login or Become a Paid Subscriber to View this Content
If you are already a paid subscriber, please follow the steps below.
