Hospital Groups Back Feds in United Therapeutics 340B Contract Pharmacy Case

United Therapeutics’ denials of and restrictions on 340B pricing involving contract pharmacies are illegal and jeopardize patient care, six hospital groups have told a federal district judge.

Drug manufacturer United Therapeutics’ (UT) denials of and restrictions on 340B drug discounts when covered entities use contract pharmacies are illegal and jeopardize patient care, six hospital groups have told a federal district judge in Washington, D.C.

The groups—American Hospital

Read More »

340B Entities Left Out of BMS’s $75 Million Settlement; Whistleblower Pursues Case Against Lilly

340B covered entities will get none of the $75 million Bristol Myers Squibb is paying to settle claims it underreported its average manufacturer prices (AMPs) in order to underpay Medicaid drug rebates. A whistleblower is pursuing a similar case against Lilly.

340B covered entities will get none of the $75 million Bristol Myers Squibb is paying California, 27 other states, and the federal government to settle claims it underreported its average manufacturer prices (AMPs) in order to underpay Medicaid drug rebates.

Read More »

Recent Supreme Court Ruling Could Affect 340B Dispute Resolution Lawsuits

A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision involving medical device manufacturer Arthrex could influence lawsuits over the 340B program’s administrative dispute resolution (ADR) process.

A U.S. Supreme Court decision in late June about the appointment of federal administrative patent judges (APJs) could influence the outcome of several ongoing lawsuits over the 340B program’s administrative dispute resolution (ADR) process.

On June 21, the high court

Read More »

In Strongly Worded Brief in United Therapeutics Case, Feds Defend 340B Contract Pharmacy Actions

Federal officials relied “on sound statutory interpretation and sufficient evidence” when it concluded in May that United Therapeutics (UT) broke the law when it conditioned access to 340B pricing on its products, government lawyers told a federal district judge yesterday.

Federal officials relied “on sound statutory interpretation and sufficient evidence” when it concluded in May that United Therapeutics (UT) broke the law when it conditioned access to 340B pricing on its products, government lawyers told a federal district judge in

Read More »

Feds and AstraZeneca Trade Punches in Drug Maker’s 340B Lawsuit

Drug manufacturer AstraZeneca and the federal government each told a federal district court last Friday why it, and not the other, should prevail in Astra’s lawsuit over the government’s 340B contract pharmacy requirements.

Drug manufacturer AstraZeneca and the federal government each told a federal district court last Friday why it, and not the other, should prevail in Astra’s lawsuit over the government’s 340B contract pharmacy requirements.

The Aug. 6 filings were the latest

Read More »

340B to Be Key Agenda Item for Biden’s New HHS General Counsel Pick

President Biden has nominated civil rights attorney Sam Bagenstos to be HHS General Counsel.

President Biden has nominated current White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) General Counsel Sam Bagenstos to be the U.S. Health and Human Services Department (HHS) General Counsel—a post that has had a growing role in defending the 340B

Read More »

PhRMA Urges Court Again to Strike Down 340B Dispute Resolution Process

PhRMA's lawsuit challenging the 340B administrative dispute resolution process is being heard in federal district court in Baltimore.

Regulations establishing a binding administrative dispute resolution (ADR) process for the 340B program were rushed into place last December to defeat lawsuits, are fatally flawed legally and constitutionally, and should be struck down, the main U.S. trade association for drug

Read More »

Contrary to Reports, Judge in AstraZeneca Lawsuit Did Not Strike Down 340B Unlimited Contract Pharmacy, Court Clerk Says

U.S. Chief District Judge Leonard Stark did not rule that AstraZeneca is not required to deliver 340B discounts drugs to an unlimited number of contract pharmacies, the court clerk's office said today.

The clerk of the federal district court in Wilmington, Del., confirmed this morning that a judge did not rule that drug manufacturer AstraZeneca is not required to deliver 340B discounts drugs to an unlimited number of contract pharmacies. There were

Read More »

Insulin Manufacturers Colluded on 340B Contract Pharmacy After Joint Lobbying Push Failed, Lawsuit Alleges

Four insulin manufacturers conspired to deny 340B discounts on their products shipped to contract pharmacies after an effort to lobby the Trump administration failed, a lawsuit alleges.

CORRECTION Thursday, Aug. 5, 2021, 8:15 p.m.—Earlier today, we misdescribed Novo Nordisk’s 340B contract pharmacy policy. Beginning on Jan. 1, 2021, Novo Nordisk stopped facilitating bill to/ship to distribution of 340B product to hospital contract pharmacies. We incorrectly said Novo

Read More »

Health Center Files 340B Contract Pharmacy Antitrust Suit Against Insulin Makers, Seeks Nationwide Class Action Certification

The reception area in Mosaic Health's Illion, N.Y., location. Mosaic accuses four insulin manufacturers in a new lawsuit of conspiring to raise prices for 340B entities that use contract pharmacies.

An upstate New York health center has sued the nation’s four major insulin manufacturers for allegedly conspiring to stop offering 340B pricing when covered entities use contract pharmacies.

Mosaic Health’s July 30 lawsuit claims that insulin manufacturers’ Sanofi, Eli

Read More »
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
×

*Sign up for news summaries and alerts from 340B Report

Site Footer Live