Category: Judicial

In a decision that could have significant implications for 340B stakeholders, a federal district judge in Indianapolis today granted drug manufacturer Eli Lilly’s motion for a preliminary injunction stopping the U.S. Health and Human Services Department from implementing or enforcing

Drug manufacturer Sanofi on Monday struck back at the U.S. Justice Department (DOJ) for opposing its Feb. 2 motion in a federal lawsuit requesting an injunction against the 340B program’s new administrative dispute resolution (ADR) process.

“The government is eager

Hospital groups that recently filed a motion to intervene in opposition to drug manufacturer Eli Lilly’s lawsuit against the federal government over 340B contract pharmacy requirements also are trying to intervene in similar suits against the government by manufacturers AstraZeneca,

The hospital groups that last week lost a federal lawsuit in California to make federal health officials enforce 340B contract pharmacy requirements for drug manufacturers have asked a federal court in Indiana to make them parties in opposition to manufacturer

Thirty-six state and regional hospital associations on Tuesday urged the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a federal appeals court’s 2-1 July 2020 decision that upheld the nearly 30 percent cut since 2018 in 340B hospitals’ drug reimbursement under the hospital

The U.S. Justice Department (DOJ) on Tuesday asked a federal district judge in Indianapolis, in a strongly worded filing, to deny drug manufacturer Eli Lilly’s motion in late January to block the 340B program’s new administrative dispute resolution (ADR) process.

A federal district judge in Oakland, Calif., on Tuesday expressed doubt that she had jurisdiction to require the U.S. Health and Human Services Department (HHS) to make drug manufacturers repay 340B hospitals for drug discounts that the companies have declined