Judge Sets Deadlines for Briefs in 340B Contract Pharmacy Antitrust Suit

U.S. Chief District Judge Elizabeth Wolford has set deadlines for briefs in a New York health center's 340B contract pharmacy antitrust lawsuit against four drug companies.

A federal district judge in Rochester, N.Y., has given four insulin and diabetes drug manufacturers until Oct. 29 to file a motion to dismiss an upstate New York health center’s lawsuit claiming the manufacturers conspired to stop offering 340B pricing

Read More »

New Judge Assigned to PhRMA’s Lawsuit Challenging Arkansas’s First-of-Its-Kind 340B Nondiscrimination Law

U.S. Senior District Judge Billy Roy Wilson has been assigned to PhRMA's lawsuit challenging Arkansas’s 340B nondiscrimination act.

A new federal district judge has been assigned to Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America’s (PhRMA) lawsuit challenging Arkansas’s 340B nondiscrimination act.

PhRMA’s case, filed on Sept. 29, was initially assigned to U.S. District Judge Lee Rudofsky, a Trump appointee.

Read More »

Montana GOP Congressman Proposes a Host of New Conditions on 340B Hospitals

First-term U.S. Rep. Matt Rosendale (R-Mont.) has introduced a bill to impose a host of new conditions on hospital participation in the 340B drug discount program.

Montana’s at-large Republican U.S. congressman has introduced a bill to impose a host of new conditions on hospital participation in the 340B drug discount program.

First-term U.S. Rep. Matt Rosendale (R-Mont.) isn’t a member of the House Energy & Commerce

Read More »

Federal Appeals Court Hears Arguments in Case Involving Walgreens’s 340B Program

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit heard arguments in J.R. v. Walgreens Boots Alliance on Sept. 22.

A federal appeals court is considering some South Carolina Walgreens customers’ claims that Walgreens, in its capacity as a 340B contract pharmacy and as a 340B contract pharmacy third-party administrator (TPA), violated their privacy rights under South Carolina law.

The

Read More »

Final 340B Registration Period of 2021 Ends on Oct. 15

The final 340B covered entity registration period of 2021 ends on Friday, Oct. 15.

The final 340B covered entity registration period of the year began on Friday, Oct. 1 and ends on Friday, Oct. 15. Eligible hospitals, health centers, clinics, and their child sites and contract pharmacies registered during the period can begin participating

Read More »

Breaking News

Breaking: HRSA Tells Boehringer Ingelheim its 340B Contract Pharmacy Restrictions Are Illegal

HRSA informed Boehringer Ingelheim today that its restrictions on 340B pricing when hospitals use contract pharmacies are illegal.

A senior federal health official informed drug manufacturer Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) today its restrictions on 340B pricing when hospitals use contract pharmacies are illegal and must end immediately, or BI could face civil monetary penalties.

U.S. Health Resources and Services

Read More »

It’s Official: Biden Administration Rescinds Trump’s 340B Insulin/EpiPen Final Rule

The Biden administration announced this morning it is rescinding the Trump administration’s regulatory requirement that community health centers pass along all their 340B savings on insulin and EpiPen-like devices to low-income patients with high-cost or no health insurance.

The Biden administration this morning, as widely expected, announced it is rescinding the Trump administration’s regulatory requirement that community health centers pass along all their 340B savings on insulin and EpiPen-like devices to low-income patients with high-cost or no health

Read More »

PhRMA Asks Federal Court to Strike Down Arkansas’ Novel 340B Nondiscrimination Law

PhRMA recently urged CMS to establish a neutral clearinghouse and require accurate use of 340B claim modifiers to address nonduplication in its final guidance for Medicare drug price negotiations under the IRA.

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) asked a federal district court yesterday to rule that Arkansas’s 340B nondiscrimination act does not require drug manufacturers “to offer price discounts under the 340B program to contract pharmacies in Arkansas.”

PhRMA also

Read More »

340B Dispute Resolution Process is Constitutional, Feds Tell Court

A recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling confirms that the 340B administrative dispute resolution process is constitutional, government lawyers told a federal district judge this month.

A recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling about administrative law judges who hear patent disputes confirms that rules establishing the 340B program’s administrative dispute resolution (ADR) process are constitutional, government lawyers told a federal district judge this month.

Under the 340B

Read More »

Hospital Groups and Drug Industry Vendor File Briefs in Sanofi’s 340B Contract Pharmacy Suit

A federal district judge this week let six hospitals groups and a drug industry vendor file amicus briefs in Sanofi's 340B contract pharmacy lawsuit.

A federal district judge this week gave six hospital groups and a drug industry services provider permission to separately offer their expert advice in drug manufacturer Sanofi’s 340B contract pharmacy lawsuit.

In a friend-of-the-court brief, the hospital groups accused

Read More »
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
×

*Sign up for news summaries and alerts from 340B Report

Site Footer Live