State Bill That Would Have Stopped Drug Industry from Imposing 340B Contract Pharmacy Restrictions Dies

Legislation in Connecticut that would have kept drug manufacturers from imposing “any preconditions, limitations, delays or other barriers” to 340B drug purchases “that are not required” by the 340B statute, died when this year’s legislative session ended on May 4.

Please Login or Become a Paid Subscriber to View this Content

If you are already a paid subscriber, please follow the steps below.

Please be sure you’ve completed your one-minute subscription completion form.
I have read and accepted the terms of use and privacy policy.
Log In!

State Bill That Would Have Stopped Drug Industry from Imposing 340B Contract Pharmacy Restrictions Dies

Please Login or Become a Paid Subscriber to View this Content

If you are already a paid subscriber, please follow the steps below.

If you are not yet a paid subscriber, please Subscribe now.

For questions about subscriptions or technical assistance, please contact Reshma Eggleston at reshma.eggleston@340breport.com.

Tom Mirga