The 340B Coalition told Express Scripts that covered entities cannot comply with its new 340B claims submission and identification requirement absent "a massive investment of financial and human resources." | Shutterstock

340B Groups Ask Express Scripts to Drop Claims Submission and ID Requirement

Groups representing 340B health care providers have asked pharmacy benefit manager Express Scripts (ESI) to stop making 340B providers and their contract pharmacies retrospectively submit and flag 340B claims in a way that has never been done before, and that cannot be done “without a massive investment of financial and human resources.”

The 13 provider associations in the 340B Coalition, in a March 26 letter, told ESI that entities and contract pharmacies “currently lack the systems and processes” to use electronic prescription claims transaction N1 to resubmit previously adjudicated claims that are later determined to be 340B-eligible.

Groups representing 340B health care providers have asked pharmacy benefit manager Express Scripts (ESI) to stop making 340B providers and their contract pharmacies retrospectively submit and flag 340B claims in a way that has never been done before, and that cannot be done “without a massive investment of financial and human resources.”

Please Login or Become a Paid Subscriber to View this Content

If you are already a paid subscriber, please follow the steps below.
If you are not yet a paid subscriber, please Subscribe now.
For questions about subscriptions or technical assistance, please contact Reshma Eggleston at reshma.eggleston@340breport.com.
« Read Previous Read Next »
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
×

×

*Sign up for news summaries and alerts from 340B Report

Site Footer