Industry Insights Logo

The Evolving Impact of 340B on Specialty Pharmacy

SPONSORED CONTENT

The 340B program continues to be a central topic of discussion in the pharmaceutical landscape, especially as specialty medications become an increasing portion of healthcare spending. Specialty pharmacies, covered entities (CEs), and manufacturers are navigating a complex environment shaped by regulatory updates, financial pressures, and patient care demands. This article provides a timely overview of the current state of 340B as it intersects with specialty pharmacy and highlights the opportunities and challenges stakeholders face.

340B’s Expanding Role in Specialty Pharmacy

340B, designed to help safety net providers stretch scare resources and provide more comprehensive services, has grown more complex but continues to be a vital lifeline for vulnerable patient populations. Specialty drugs, which are often high-cost and used to treat complex conditions like cancer, HIV, and autoimmune diseases, are increasingly a focal point within the 340B space. These medications, while accounting for a smaller percentage of prescriptions, represent a growing share of drug spending and are critical for the patients served by 340B-covered entities.

For specialty pharmacies, the 340B program offers significant opportunities. By partnering with CEs, specialty pharmacies can extend their services to more patients, particularly those in underserved areas or facing financial barriers to accessing their medications. These partnerships enable specialty pharmacies to leverage the purchasing power of 340B, providing costly medications at lower prices and improving patient adherence through enhanced services like medication management, patient education, transportation and financial assistance.

Challenges in the Current Landscape

Despite the benefits, there are significant challenges that both CEs and specialty pharmacies face within the 340B framework.

1. Contract Pharmacy Restrictions: In recent years, drug manufacturers have placed increasing restrictions on 340B pricing for drugs dispensed through contract pharmacies. Many manufacturers argue that the proliferation of contract pharmacy arrangements has led to abuses within the program, with entities profiting from 340B discounts without ensuring the savings benefit patients. Providers strongly dispute these allegations and point out that they are good stewards of the program.  Over 30 manufacturers have significantly limited or have eliminated altogether discounts on drugs dispensed through contract pharmacies, especially those handling high-cost specialty medications. These restrictions have led to lawsuits and policy debates, as the government and CEs argue that contract pharmacies are a critical access point for patients, particularly in rural or underserved areas.

2. Audits and Compliance: The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), which oversees the 340B program, has ramped up its auditing efforts in recent years. CEs and their pharmacy partners must ensure strict compliance with program guidelines to avoid penalties. This includes maintaining accurate records of drug purchases and dispensing, preventing diversion of 340B drugs to ineligible patients, and ensuring proper patient eligibility criteria. For specialty pharmacies, this adds a layer of complexity, as these medications often require detailed tracking and reporting, particularly when dealing with complex patient populations and various funding sources, such as Medicaid and Medicare.

3. Financial Pressures: Specialty pharmacies operate within a tight margin environment, where managing high-cost therapies can present financial risks. While 340B allows for lower drug acquisition costs, reimbursement rates for many specialty drugs have been declining. Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) and insurers have been scrutinizing reimbursement for 340B drugs, often implementing lower payment rates for 340B dispensed drugs than non-340B drugs. This has led some specialty pharmacies to reconsider their participation in 340B contracts, as the financial benefits of accessing 340B drugs are diminished by reduced reimbursement.

4. Manufacturer Rebate Strategies: Another emerging trend is the use of manufacturer rebates and pricing strategies that bypass 340B CEs. Drug manufacturers have increasingly shifted to offering higher rebates on specialty medications to PBMs and insurers, leaving 340B entities with a smaller share of the discounts. These strategies can erode the financial benefits of 340B pricing for CEs, which rely on these savings to support patient care programs.

Policy and Legislative Developments

340B future is under scrutiny from both lawmakers and regulatory agencies. Legislative proposals aimed at increasing transparency have been introduced, targeting how CEs use the savings from the program. These proposals also include greater oversight of contract pharmacies and tighter regulations on patient eligibility.

In addition, the ongoing legal disputes between CEs and manufacturers over contract pharmacy restrictions are likely to shape the program’s future. If courts uphold the manufacturers’ restrictions, it could limit the reach of 340B savings, particularly for specialty pharmacies that rely heavily on contract pharmacy models to serve their patient populations. Conversely, if the courts side with the state and federal governments who have gone to bat for 340B providers, manufacturers may be forced to lift these restrictions, potentially reshaping the specialty pharmacy landscape.

At the state level, several states have introduced or passed laws to restore access to 340B pricing in the contract pharmacy setting and even more states have enacted laws to prohibit discriminatory reimbursement practices against 340B entities by PBMs. These laws aim to protect the financial viability of 340B pharmacies by ensuring they are not unfairly reimbursed at lower rates than non-340B entities. However, enforcement and the long-term impact of these state laws remain uncertain, as drug manufacturers and PBMs continue to challenge these laws in court.  So far, however, the laws have withstood judicial scrutiny and could serve as a way to protect 340B savings.

Opportunities for Specialty Pharmacies

Despite the challenges, specialty pharmacies partnering with 340B providers offer significant opportunities to improve patient care and expand their services. By strengthening partnerships with covered entities, specialty pharmacies can help ensure that patients continue to have access to life-saving medications at reduced costs. Additionally, specialty pharmacies can offer value-added services such as adherence programs, care coordination, and outcome tracking, which are increasingly important as healthcare shifts toward value-based care models.

Technology and data analytics also present a key area of opportunity for specialty pharmacies in the 340B space. With the increasing complexity of tracking patient eligibility, drug utilization, and compliance requirements, specialty pharmacies can leverage advanced data systems to streamline operations and improve efficiency. These systems can help pharmacies navigate audits, ensure accurate reporting, and maximize 340B benefits for both patients and CEs.

Conclusion

As the healthcare landscape continues to evolve, 340B remains a crucial tool for ensuring that underserved populations have access to specialty medications and ensuring that CEs can continue their mission of providing care to all regardless of ability to pay. However, the program faces increasing scrutiny and challenges, particularly in the areas of contract pharmacy arrangements, compliance, and reimbursement. Specialty pharmacies, CEs, and manufacturers must work together to address these issues and ensure the program continues to fulfill its mission. By doing so, they can help provide critical support for patients in need, while navigating the financial and regulatory complexities that define the current 340B landscape.

In this time of rapid change, the future of 340B and specialty pharmacy will likely depend on how well stakeholders adapt to new legislative and regulatory developments, legal decisions, and market dynamics.

William Riley is VP Commercial Analytics at Maxor. He can be reached at wariley@maxor.com.

Website | + posts

Read more 340B Expert Tips

« Read Previous Read Next »
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
×
×

*Sign up for news summaries and alerts from 340B Report

Site Footer Live